03 · Why an Anti-speciesist Revolution

International Anti-speciesist Petition

Why an anti-speciesist revolution?

It would be pointless to try to set out on this website the full range of serious, contemporary consequences caused by animal farming and exploitation for humanity’s future. We refer you to the numerous scientific reports demonstrating the well-established links1 between animal exploitation and:

  • Public health and zoonotic diseases2
  • Climate change3
  • Pollution and the massive destruction of terrestrial and marine ecosystems, biotopes and biocenoses4
  • The loss of terrestrial and marine biodiversity5
  • The waste and pollution of terrestrial and marine natural resources6
  • The massive waste of public money7
  • Deforestation8
  • Etc.

Animal exploitation is furthermore responsible for the killing of around 90 billion land animals and several thousand billion marine animals every year9.

It is now established that humanity could, and should, very largely do without animal exploitation in order to preserve liveable conditions on Earth.

Today, we are entirely capable of producing tasty food products without having to exploit or kill non-human animals. The scientific knowledge and technical know-how already exist. All that is missing is public policy and investors.

For a fuller overview of the harmful consequences of animal exploitation, we refer you to the website of the ASBL Ligue Internationale Antispéciste.

Notes

  1. See in particular the references cited in the following notes, each of which supports one of the points in the list above.
  2. Jones, K.E. et al. (2008), “Global trends in emerging infectious diseases”, Nature, 451, pp. 990–993.
  3. IPCC (2019), Climate Change and Land: Special Report, chapter on food systems and livestock; Gerber, P.J. et al. (2013), Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock, FAO.
  4. FAO (2006), Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options.
  5. Machovina, B., Feeley, K.J., Ripple, W.J. (2015), “Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption”, Science of the Total Environment, 536, pp. 419–431.
  6. Mekonnen, M.M., Hoekstra, A.Y. (2012), “A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products”, Ecosystems, 15, pp. 401–415.
  7. OECD reports on agricultural subsidies; see also the analyses by the Food and Land Use Coalition (FOLU) on the allocation of public funds to livestock farming.
  8. Ritchie, H. (2021), “Cutting down forests: what are the drivers of deforestation?”, Our World in Data.
  9. L214, Dossier: Les chiffres clés de la souffrance animale, 2023, online: l214.com — figures derived from FAOSTAT, the FAO’s database.

Do you share this conviction?

Read the full text of the petition and add your signature.

Sign the petition →